Stelvio 2.2 diesel Q4 Vs Jaguar F-Pace 2.0D AWD - Alfa Romeo Stelvio Forum
 3Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 23 (permalink) Old 05-07-2017, 09:07 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 18
Stelvio 2.2 diesel Q4 Vs Jaguar F-Pace 2.0D AWD

Another comparison between Stelvio 2.2 diesel Q4 and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0D AWD by italian magazine Quattroruote, Stelvio is the winner by far.

Stelvio performance disrupts the 4 cylinder diesel competition, in straight line speed is almost as fast as the 3.0V6 diesels of the competition, faster than the F-Pace S 3.0V6 diesel, on track is almost 5"0 faster than the F-Pace 2.0 Diesel AWD, 4"6 faster than the Audi Q5 2.0TDI 190hp Quattro, 7"0 faster than Mercedes GLC 220d 4Matic, 2"9 seconds faster than the 6 cylinder 3.0l BMW X4 xDrive30d M Sport with staggered tyres.
Stelvio 2.2 diesel Q4 with standard suspension, 235 tyres and an ESP you cannot switch off, is just 0"79 slower than then 3.0V6 Porsche Macan S diesel with the optional staggered tyres(265 front/295 rear), optional PASM suspension, optional Chrono Sport Pack and the ESP switched off.
And all this with the lowest fuel consumption in its segment.
Is a game changer.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	stelviovsfpace.jpg
Views:	208
Size:	309.2 KB
ID:	9  
rossocompetizione is offline  
post #2 of 23 (permalink) Old 05-09-2017, 11:25 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 146
The Stelvio may not be as fuel efficient, but its overall performance seems to be ahead of the F-Pace, at least from what I can understand in that comparison. NOt quite sure what the chart is telling me.
ilhatch is offline  
post #3 of 23 (permalink) Old 05-09-2017, 06:39 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 18
No, Stelvio 2.2 diesel Q4 is more fuel efficient than F-Pace 2.0D AWD, actually best in class.


Combined Consumption
Stelvio 2.2 diesel Q4: 13,3km/l = 31,3mpg
F-Pace 2.0D AWD: 12,8km/l = 30,1mpg

previous tests of the same magazine
GLC 220 d 4Matic: 13,3km/l = 31,3mpg
new Audi Q5 2.0TDI Quattro: 13,1km/l = 30,8mpg

Performance

0-100km/h(0-62mph)
Stelvio 2.2 diesel Q4 6"5
F-Pace 2.0D AWD 9"8

0-160km/h(0-100mph)
Stelvio 17"6
F-Pace 28"9

0-400m(0-1/4 mile)
Stelvio 14"7
F-Pace 16"9

70-120km/h(44-75mph) in D
Stelvio 6"8
F-Pace 9"9

100-0km/h (62-0mph)
Stelvio 39,7m = 130ft
F-Pace 39,5m =130ft

160-0km/h (100-0mph)
Stelvio 93,4m = 306ft
F-Pace 94,5m = 310ft

lateral acceleration
Stelvio 1,03g (with ESP On!!!)
F-Pace 0,97g (with ESP off)

lap in Vairano test track
Stelvio 2.2 diesel Q4: 1'24"49 (with ESP On!!!)
F-Pace 2.0D AWD: 1'29"40 (with ESP off)

previous tests of Quattroruote
new Audi Q5 2.0TDI Quattro: 1'29"13 (with ESP sport)
Mercedes GLC 220 d 4Matic: 1'31"48 (with ESP off)

Also if you check the graphics F-Pace is better as acoustic comfort, but Stelvio is superior as suspension comfort and vibrations, which means that it has better ride quality.
ilhatch and cptwei like this.
rossocompetizione is offline  
post #4 of 23 (permalink) Old 05-09-2017, 06:57 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 18
Stelvio is the only SUV that has performance similar to the sedan it derives from

data from Quattroruote magazine (SUV Vs Sedan with the same engine)

lap in Vairano track

Stelvio 2.2 diesel Q4 1'24"49
Giulia Veloce 2.2 diesel Q4 1'24"50

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0D AWD 1'29"40
Jaguar XE 2.0D 1'27"20

Audi Q5 2.0TDI Quattro 1'29"13
Audi A4 2.0TDI 1'28"03

Mercedes GLC 220 d 4matic 1'31"48
Mercedes C 220 d 1'29"30
rossocompetizione is offline  
post #5 of 23 (permalink) Old 05-09-2017, 07:07 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 18
some more extracts from the test about luggage, space and visibility, with measurements. Win-win-win for Stelvio.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	luggage.png
Views:	144
Size:	543.5 KB
ID:	17   Click image for larger version

Name:	visibilityspace.png
Views:	155
Size:	781.7 KB
ID:	25  
rossocompetizione is offline  
post #6 of 23 (permalink) Old 05-09-2017, 07:56 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 18
As you probably don't know Italian.

pagella = report card

driving position:
Stelvio 4,5
F-Pace 5

commands and instrumentation:
Stelvio 4,5
F-Pace 3,5

audio & navigation
Stelvio 4
F-Pace 3,5

Visibility
Stelvio 3,5
F-Pace 3

Fit and finish
Stelvio 4,5
F-Pace 4,5

optional accessories list
Stelvio 3,5
F-Pace 4,5

Security equipment
Stelvio: 3,5
F-Pace: 3,5

Driving assistance
Stelvio: 4
F-Pace: 3,5

Cabin Space
Stelvio: 4,5
F-Pace: 4

Luggage (Trunk Space)
Stelvio: 4
F-Pace: 3,5

Comfort
Stelvio: 4
F-Pace: 4,5

Engine
Stelvio: 5
F-Pace: 3,5

Acceleration:
Stelvio: 5
F-Pace: 3

Reprise (acceleration in motion e.g. 50-75mph)
Stelvio: 5
F-Pace: 3,5

transmission
Stelvio: 5
F-Pace: 4

steering
Stelvio: 5
F-Pace: 3,5

brakes
Stelvio: 4,5
F-Pace: 5

fuel consumption
Stelvio: 4
F-Pace: 3,5

Warranty*
Stelvio: 2
F-Pace: 3

*in Italy Alfa offers the EU standard 2 years as base warranty, and Jaguar Italia offers 3 years. In US the situation is totally different as Alfa USA offers 4 years warranty and Jaguar USA offers also 4 years warranty.
rossocompetizione is offline  
post #7 of 23 (permalink) Old 05-10-2017, 11:23 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 146
Thanks for the translations! The Stelvio is the overall winner and they're both similarly priced too. I'm more of a petrol person, but I'm sure its performance is no less spectacular when compared to a petrol F-Pace.
ilhatch is offline  
post #8 of 23 (permalink) Old 05-13-2017, 09:55 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 139
Other than that, I mean overall just looking at the two, The Stelvio looks gosh darn gorgeous !!
Khan22 is offline  
post #9 of 23 (permalink) Old 05-13-2017, 10:43 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 149
The extra cargo space is a bonus, but it really won't be the deciding factor even if there's less space than the F-Pace. That's what roof racks are for. What matters is performance as those numbers can't be easily changed.
Fiver is offline  
post #10 of 23 (permalink) Old 05-15-2017, 12:44 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 139
Marginal differences in space would definitely be looked over by the majority of people.
Khan22 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Alfa Romeo Stelvio QV Debuts In Europe Stelvio News Stelvio Quadrifoglio Discussion 37 06-14-2018 02:03 AM
Stelvio Ti And Base Models Headed For New York Stelvio News 2017+ Alfa Romeo Stelvio News 8 04-22-2017 06:47 PM
Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2.0 280 Super Tested On Track Stelvio News 2017+ Alfa Romeo Stelvio News 4 03-26-2017 11:58 PM

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome