Alfa Romeo Stelvio Forum banner

Comparing my loaner 2022 Stelvio TI with 400 miles to our 2018 Base Stelvio (night and day, not what I expected).

3.8K views 15 replies 8 participants last post by  psujwj  
#1 ·
Thought everyone might find this interesting.

Bought the base 2018 with 11K miles about a year ago. Currently at the dealer getting a new turbo, so they loaned me a brand new 22 TI with 400 miles on the ODO:

Driving off the lot imeddiatly felt the difference, and it was HUGE. But not in a good way.

1. The newer Stelvio has comparitively terrible handling as the whole car wallows from one side to another when given quick steering input.. it now suddenly FEELS like and SUV, which my Stelvio completely hides. Steering seems way slower, and takes more effort than mine, and doesn't track perfectly around corners ... a lot closer to its German rivals, and that's not a compliment. My Stelvio has amazing driving dynamics by comparison. Either the steering on mine is quicker, or it just feels that way because it's clear after driving the new one that Alfa reduced the spring strength which causes the front end to dive more when turning and during braking. The car is lazy to turn now and I feld much less in control. The one thing all this does is make the new Alfa more luxurious as it does not make such a fuss when encountering a bump, but heck if I wanted a Cadilac I would have bought one.

2. The new car also feels less powerful. This can however be a head fake, as mine has one of those accelerator booster pedel which merely amplifies throttle input, but if so ... wow, didn't realize what a diffence that made until I drove the new car. But even so, it really does feel like the acceleration itself is slow... with more lag.

3. The infotainment system is nicer but for what I use it for which is switching to Youtube and changing input device, as well as just FM stations, it seems more complicated. This is likely it being new and requiring more time behind the wheel.

In summary - I'd not buy a 2022 Stelvio, after comparing it to my 2018. I would never had thought there was a difference, but to me, it's a step backward.
 
#7 ·
I hear you. This is a permanent replacement for our 2019 Lusso. I’d say right away the sport seats are much more supportive than the Lusso’s seats but Lusso leather quality is much better than Veloce.
Handling much, I don’t really perceive any differences except for the brakes that are way more assuring than the Lusso’s - the car at the trade-in had 28.8K miles with the brakes replaced around 20K miles. I didn’t open it up yet as the car had 18 mi at the delivery.
 
#4 ·
I have seen a couple of these posts now. Perhaps the engine just needs breaking in because it's so new but that certainly wouldn't account for a change in handling characteristics. And then you have this quote from Squadra Tuner, a well respected Alfa Romeo engine tuning company:

"As stated earlier, the 2.0 Turbo MultiAir engine of the Stelvio has been put on the market with 280 hp and 400 Nm. However, the rollingroad shows very different values. Everything between 440 and 460 Nm and between 280 and 310 (!) Hp is possible. The first-produced Stelvio’s scored highest". 2.0 Turbo 280 pk E6B/E6D Chiptuning - Squadra Tuning
 
#6 ·
They did... something about turbo impeler flutter (play) outside of the acceptable limits. The car was flashed back in May-June, which could have contributed, who knows... all I know is that right after that, I got the first limp mode ever. Then the wife got it a week ago, about 1 month from when I first got it. In both cases, turning the car off, and letting it rest for an hour resolved the problem, but of course that's not going to fly for long... so I took it in last Friday, hence the swap.

One thing I didn't mention in my review of the 22 TI is that, I did get the feeling that whomever used it before me (could only have been one person since the car only had 400 Miles on the ODO) likely didn't fill it up with Super Unleaded, as I thought I heard a knock, not sure... but that certainly would have knocked a few horsepower out. I just took a trip to Palm Springs, and am ready to refuel, so I'll report back if Super Unleaded helped. That BTW is another topic altogether... people that rent or get loaner cars that use Super Unleaded, and treat it like a rented mule by refueling with regular. Not fair to the poor smuck that uses or buys it later... wish there was a report on these cars to ferret those folks out... oh well.
 
#8 · (Edited)
Did your 2018 Base have a sunroof. I have a 2018 Ti, no sunroof, so it is essentially a base with 19” wheels from a dynamic driving point of view. My car is very early production as well, the car data plate indicates early 2017.
  • I have seen the report of early cars having perhaps more power. Alfa probably would not want to disclose that. I def don’t want my ECU to be reflashed.
  • Modern engines break in fast but with only 400 miles still pretty tight and the tranny has not adapted to your driving style.
  • The 18” 235 tires/wheels on a base will be generally lighter than 20” wheels with 255, same overall diameter. While a shorter sidewall should give better steering response, the lighter rolling stock has less weight to accelerate and lower unsprung weight. You will find that Alfas traditionally do not use wide tires versus German cars, with more suspension compliance, that gives a light-on-feet feeling. A Guilia base has relatively narrow tires as well on 17” wheels.
  • Changes in tires can have a big effect, I use 255/50-19 Michelin Pilot Sport SUV which have way more feel and directness versus stock tires. They do weight 3 lbs more per tire than original 235/55-19 Continentals. I just looked and the 235/60-18 Conti weight 1lb less per tire vs the 235/55-19, and cheaper to boot. My winter tires are way less fun than the summer tires, duh.
  • Has Alfa changed shock and spring rates since the early cars? I think I read that but not sure.
  • The non-sunroof cars will be a little lighter and losing that weight up high should make a difference. Also a few pounds in heavier side glass and maybe sound insulation? It all adds up.

I really like the way my ‘18 drives. Perhaps some/all of the above adds up to a difference you can feel. I am not surprised if Alfa has taken off some of the sharp edges to make the car more appealing to the mass market, but not to you or me.

My ‘18 has 56k miles. Yes I did end up replacing the radiator just after warranty expired (I should have caught that) and my drivers seat switch is becoming problematic. The car is tight and rattle free, still drives so well I am tempted To upgrade to a hybrid turbo or at least a tune. I use a weathertech phone holder and don’t miss the more sophisticated infotainment. I do have the dynamic package with adaptive cruise which is great. Supersprint exhaust bought used sounds great (it is resonator delete but not rear muffler delete). I don’t miss shift paddles, I use the center stick if I want to drive manually like my older manual tranny cars 🙂 Just replaced original battery for peace-of-mind, it was over 5 years old.

Hope your ‘18 comes back as remembered.
 
#10 ·
Have not driven. My understanding was the “sport-tuned” cars had slightly stiffer front shocks. In Europe perhaps the sport suspension had Koni FSD style shocks (not Konis but have variable valving) that are presumably a bit stiffer. The dynamic suspension cars had definitely stiffer sport setting shocks and normal was less stiff than a base suspension. Their are difference is spring heights but not sure about rates. QV cars obviously completely different.

I actually wouldn’t want my car to have stiffer shocks for how I use it. The Michelin Pilot sport tires stiffen the ride a bit. An upgrade which Alfa didn’t use on any cars is a magnaride-type shock which is clearly more advanced for combining ride and handling.
 
#11 ·
I drove them back to back when I bought mine.

Same wheel/tire combo, the sport has more impact harshness over bumps, slightly less lean through corners and less dive when braking. Not night and day but enough I decided the base suspension was better for my purposes.
 
#13 ·
Pretty sure its just the shocks sport vs non-sport.

Now if you are talking about the differences between the original suspension and the 2020 refresh.. that is more complex. The 2020 is physically lower then the previous model, so the geometry is completely different... Could be any number of changes made to achieve that, especially in the steering linkage. I'de be more surprised if there wasn't a difference, which there can't be too huge of a difference, since most people going from the older to newer models haven't reported anything... But some do.
 
#14 ·
I have found a thread, where somebody explains that the Q4 sway bar is thicker than the Q2 SUVs. But I would like to be sure about this info.
It would be nice, if somebody could measure with a caliper the rear sway bar thickness, on a Q4 SUV.
 
#15 ·
So, just traded in my 2019 Sport for 2022 Veloce. Loved the 2019; it had the stiffer front dampers, and 20s vs 21s on the Veloce. When I test drove the newer car, it did seem less explosive acceleration-wise, and even now, a month later and broken in, I can tell Alfa recalibrated the throttle response from off idle acceleration, to come in smoother. But, it now, with 700 miles on it, seems just as quick. Of course, they also changed the dna switch to default to n on every restart, which I don’t love. Steering/Handling? Other than a little more strike through with the 21 inch rims I didn’t notice any difference-still excellent turn in and handling. Current car has LSD, which 2019 did not. Sport seats and infotainment on new car much better, and I like the leather dash treatment, too. Thicker front glass means it’s a bit quieter, too. All in all, the newer car seems a bit more refined; I would have been happy to keep the 2019, but dealer offered me a lot of money for it, so I traded up, and glad I did..